Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology

Background: Even for experienced operators, endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms involves intraoperative uncertainty that may lead to adjustments in strategy, prolong the procedure, and potentially cause inefficiency and device waste. This study aimed to evaluate whether pre-procedural testing (PPT) of endovascular treatment using patient-specific models was associated with increased operator confidence and perceived clinical utility, including improvements in procedural efficiency and reduced resource waste. Methods: We enrolled a cohort of patients who underwent PPT before endovascular treatment for complex unruptured intracranial aneurysms and compared their outcomes with a control group treated without PPT. The primary outcome was the Training Fidelity Score, a composite of three operator-reported Likert items defined a priori. Secondary outcomes included perceived clinical utility, intraoperative strategy changes, procedural time, radiation exposure, device waste and safety. Results: A total of 85 patients met the inclusion criteria (PPT=40; control=45). The Training Fidelity Score was high across the PPT group (median, 4.33/5). Perceived clinical utility was high and further increased significantly after the procedure. A significant reduction was observed in intraoperative strategy changes, with no changes recorded in the PPT group, compared to 6/45 in the control group (RR 0.09; p=0.027). Reductions in treatment time, radiation exposure and device waste were also noted. Conclusion: PPT using patient-specific models was associated with increased operator confidence, fewer intraoperative strategy changes, improved procedural efficiency, and reduced device waste without compromising safety. These findings support its use in pre-interventional preparation, but require prospective multicenter validation.

Abstract Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) plus endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) versus direct EVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) treated within the 6- to 24-hour time window. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of prospective EVT registry from 10 comprehensive stroke centers in China and Singapore between 2019 and 2024. Eligible patients had anterior circulation LVO, underwent EVT within 6-24 hours of onset, had ASPECTS 6, NIHSS 6, and pre-stroke mRS 2. Patients were stratified into bridging IVT + EVT (IVT group) versus direct EVT alone (non-IVT group). Propensity score matching (1:2 ratio) was performed to balance baseline covariates. The primary outcome was 3-month favorable functional outcome (mRS 0-2). Secondary outcomes included successful recanalization (mTICI 2b-3), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), hemorrhagic transformation (HT) and 3-month mortality. In the matched cohort, binary outcomes were compared using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. Results: Of 772 included patients, 110 (14.2%) received bridging IVT and 662 (85.8%) received direct EVT. After propensity score matching, 202 non-IVT patients were matched to 101 IVT patients, with all covariates well-balanced (absolute SMD <0.10). In the matched cohort, bridging IVT was not associated with a significant difference in 3-month favorable outcome (44.55% vs. 47.03%; common OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.56-1.46), successful recanalization (91.09% vs. 90.10%; OR 1.11; 0.51-2.44), sICH (5.94% vs. 9.41%; OR 0.61; 0.24-1.58), HT (23.76% vs. 23.27%; OR 1.03; 0.57-1.85), or 3-month mortality (15.84% vs. 13.37%; OR 1.22; 0.62-2.37). Conclusion: In this large multicenter propensity score-matched analysis, bridging intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular thrombectomy in the 6- to 24-hour time window was not significantly associated with improved efficacy or increased safety risks compared with direct endovascular therapy alone.

Objective: To assess ethnic disparities in time to hospital presentation, use of acute reperfusion therapies, and in-hospital treatment times among patients presenting with stroke in a Dutch emergency department. Methods: In this single-centre observational cohort study, we included patients with a first-ever ischemic stroke between September 2020 and September 2021. Patients were categorized by ethnicity (with or without migration background). Demographic and stroke characteristics were compared between groups. Outcomes included: rates of presentation outside therapeutic time window, acute reperfusion therapy (intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT)), and, when applicable, door-to-treatment time (DTTT), with a door-to-needle time (DTNT) and door-to-groin time (DTGT) for IVT and EVT respectively. Univariable and multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses were performed, adjusted for age, sex, and NIHSS at presentation, where appropriate. Results: A total of 232 patients were included, of whom 62 (26.7%) had a migration background. These patients were younger (66.6 vs 71.2 years) and more frequently had diabetes (27.4% vs 15.9%). Sex distribution was similar (59.7% vs 60.6% male). Stroke etiology differed between groups with less cardio-embolism (4.8% vs 15.3%) and more small vessel disease (69.4% vs 48.2%) among patients with a migration background. These latter patients presented more often outside the therapeutic time window (53.2% vs 37.1%; OR 1.90; 95% CI 1.05-3.45). EVT was less frequently performed in patients with a migration background compared to those without (8.1% vs 22.4%; OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.10-0.75). There were no significant differences in treatment times (DTTT 38min vs 30min, DTNT 35min vs 26min, DTGT 64min vs 54min). Conclusion: Patients with a migration background were more likely to present outside the therapeutic time window and had a lower rate of EVT. In order to improve access for these patients, more insight into prehospital and within hospital barriers and facilitators for appropriate management are needed.

BackgroundAcute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) causes devastating strokes. Despite the benefit of endovascular treatment, the optimal management remains sometimes controversial, such as for patients with mild deficits, and would benefit from robust prognostic tools. Given the dense white matter networks within the posterior fossa, we tested whether quantifying disconnections from acute diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) could improve outcome prediction and responders to recanalization compared with conventional metrics. MethodsWe conducted a secondary analysis from a prospective multicenter stroke registry, including consecutive patients (2017-2024) with BAO and admission MRI. Ultra-high-resolution diffusion MRI was acquired in healthy participants to build normative tractograms with optimized posterior fossa quality. Patient infarcts delineated on DWI were projected onto these tractograms to estimate disconnected fiber volume. The primary outcome was 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-3 vs 4-6. Predictive performance of disconnected fiber volume was compared with baseline NIHSS, infarct volume, and posterior circulation ASPECTS (pc-ASPECTS) using logistic regressions and areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). Ordinal regressions tested associations across the full mRS spectrum, stratified by recanalization status. Analyses were repeated in patients with NIHSS [&le;]10. ResultsAmong 201 patients (median age 70; NIHSS 10), 97 (48.3%) had poor outcome. Despite small median infarct volume (4.75 mL), disconnected fiber volume was substantial (median 25.15 mL). Disconnected fiber volume achieved an AUC of 0.84, outperforming NIHSS (0.67; p<0.0001), infarct volume (0.75; p=0.00059), and pc-ASPECTS (0.76; p=0.0127). Low disconnected fiber volume predicted better outcomes across the full mRS (OR=0.12 [95% CI, 0.065-0.204]) and greater benefit from successful recanalization (OR=0.33 [95% CI, 0.15-0.70]). In patients with NIHSS [&le;]10 (n=102), disconnected fiber volume remained the strongest predictor (AUC=0.83). ConclusionsDisconnected fiber volume derived indirectly is a robust prognostic marker of BAO outcomes that outperforms conventional predictors and may support future treatment decisions. Registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov - NCT03776877.

Introduction Despite the proven benefits of reperfusion therapies in acute ischemic stroke, treatment decisions in the hyperacute phase remain complex and are rarely supported by individualized outcome predictions. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based clinical decision support systems (CDSS) offer potential real-time prognostic estimates, but prospective evidence of their feasibility and performance in routine clinical workflows is limited. Our aim is to prospectively evaluate real-time feasibility, usability, and predictive performance of an AI-based CDSS (VALIDATE-CDSS) for individualized outcome prediction in acute stroke care. Methods and analysis Prospective, multicenter, observational study enrolling consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke presenting to three tertiary stroke centers. Clinical management will follow standard practice at the discretion of treating physicians. In parallel, a dedicated researcher will collect patient data in real time and input them into the VALIDATE-CDSS using a mobile application, operating in shadow mode without influencing clinical decisions. The system will generate individualized predictions of 3-month functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale) for four treatment strategies (intravenous thrombolysis, endovascular thrombectomy, combined therapy, or no reperfusion) at three sequential time points: baseline clinical data, non-contrast CT, and CT angiography. The primary outcome is the real-world feasibility and usability of the VALIDATE-CDSS in the hyperacute stroke workflow. Secondary outcomes include predictive performance, agreement between model-suggested and actual treatments, incremental value with increasing data availability, and assessment of potential bias across predefined subgroups. This study will provide prospective real-world evidence on the implementation and clinical potential of AI-based decision support for personalized treatment selection in acute ischemic stroke Ethics and dissemination Patient enrollment began after approval from the ethics committees of all participating centers. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed open-access journals and conference presentations. Following open science principles, anonymized data and metadata will be made publicly available in the Zenodo repository upon study completion. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05622539).

Abstract Background: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains a significant cause of disability worldwide. Current treatments, primarily intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), are limited by narrow time windows and reperfusion injury, leading to suboptimal outcomes for many patients. Chuanzhi Tongluo (CZTL), a traditional Chinese medicine, has been preliminarily recognized as a novel cerebral protection agent in animal models. Objectives: This trial investigates the efficacy and safety of CZTL capsule in patients with AIS who are not eligible for IVT or who experience early neurological deterioration after IVT. Methods and design: The CONCERN trial is an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-control, randomized clinical study in China. An estimated 1,208 eligible participants will be consecutively randomized to receive CZTL capsule therapy or placebo in 1:1 ratio across approximately 70 stroke centers in China. All enrolled patients are orally administered 2 capsules of CZTL or placebo 3 times a day together with antiplatelet agents for 3 months. Outcomes: The primary endpoint is an excellent functional outcome, defined as a score of 0 or 1 on the mRS at 90 days. Lead safety endpoints included 90-day mortality and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 48 hours. Conclusions: Results of CONCERN trial will determine the clinical efficacy and safety of the traditional Chinese medicine CZTL capsule in the treatment of AIS patients. Trial registry number: ChiCTR2300074147 (www.chictr.org.cn).

This research demonstrates that the trans-aqueduct approach is a feasible, minimally invasive access pathway to the third ventricle, offering a potential route to the deep brain for therapeutic technologies. Further pre-clinical investigation is required to thoroughly evaluate physiological tolerance, trauma risk, and the long-term implications of intraventricular implantation. The third ventricle is a high-value site for neuromodulation due to its proximity to deep-brain targets, including the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus internus (GPi). This study defined the anatomical pathway; and evaluated the technical feasibility of retrograde access to the third ventricle via the cerebral aqueduct using minimally invasive interventional techniques. Evaluation was conducted in three phases using human MRI datasets (n=16; mean age 48.4 years) and cadaveric specimens (n=6; mean age 88.2 years). Phase 1 involved morphometric MRI analysis of the aqueduct and ventricles. Phase 2 tested trans-aqueduct access on cadaver specimens via fluoroscopically guided guidewires and catheters. Phase 3 utilized direct anatomical dissections on cadaver specimens (n=3) to morphometrically measure the third ventricular cavity and its relationship to deep-brain nuclei. Measurements across the sample groups showed a mean aqueduct diameter of 1.6 mm (SD=0.14). Third ventricle dimensions averaged 27.6 mm (ventral-dorsal), 19.9 mm (caudal-cranial), and 5.7 mm (lateral). Successful access to the third ventricle was achieved in 83% (5/6) of cadaveric specimens. The optimal technical configuration utilized a 0.018'' angled-tip guidewire and 5-6 Fr catheters; the aqueduct accommodated diameters up to 2.0 mm with minimal resistance. The STN and GPi were localized within 5-20 mm of the ventricular volumetric centroid. The trans-aqueduct approach is a technically feasible, minimally invasive pathway for accessing the third ventricle. This route offers a potential alternative for the delivery of therapeutic neurotechnologies. Further research is required to assess physiological tolerance, trauma risk, and the long-term safety of intraventricular implantation.

Background: Prognostication after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) rarely captures long-term functional recovery, despite its importance to patients, families, and clinicians. Large trauma registries such as the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) dataset contain detailed clinical data but lack systematic follow-up, limiting their ability to study longer-term functional outcomes. Methods: We developed and externally validated a machine learning model to predict favorable six-month functional outcome (GOS MD/GR or GOSE >=5) using harmonized data from two randomized clinical trials: CRASH (training) and ROC-TBI (validation). Five candidate classifiers (random forest [RF], linear discriminant analysis, k-nearest neighbors, naive Bayes, and support vector machine) were trained using seven shared clinical predictors. Models were evaluated using ROC-AUC, calibration metrics, and performance at the Youden optimal threshold and a high-sensitivity secondary threshold. The final model was applied to patients with moderate-to-severe TBI in the national TQIP registry (2017-2022) to estimate population-level recovery patterns. Results: The RF model demonstrated the highest overall performance after recalibration, achieving strong discrimination (AUC internal and external, 0.887 and 0.784), good calibration, and high sensitivity (0.890) and negative predictive value (0.909). Applied to 63,289 patients from TQIP, the model estimated that 45% would achieve favorable six-month outcomes at the Youden optimal threshold and 57% at the high-sensitivity threshold, with predicted recovery aligning with established clinical correlates such as younger age, higher admission GCS, and lower rates of penetrating or brainstem injuries. Conclusion: A machine learning model trained on high-quality trial data can generate clinically plausible estimates of long-term functional recovery when applied at scale to national trauma registries that lack systematic follow-up. This approach enables imputation of functional outcomes in datasets lacking follow-up, supports benchmarking and quality improvement across trauma systems, and provides a foundation for future models incorporating physiologic time-series, imaging, and biomarker data.

ImportanceMigraine attacks often occur unpredictably, limiting the ability of individuals to initiate timely preventive or preemptive treatment. Short-term probabilistic forecasting of migraine risk could enable more targeted management strategies. ObjectiveTo externally validate the previously developed Headache Prediction Model (HAPRED-I), evaluate an updated continuously learning model (HAPRED-II), and assess the feasibility and short-term safety of delivering individualized probabilistic migraine forecasts directly to patients. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsProspective 8-week cohort study conducted remotely at two academic medical centers in the United States (Massachusetts General Hospital and Wake Forest Health Sciences) between 2015 and 2019. Adults with recurrent migraine or tension-type headache completed twice-daily electronic diaries. A total of 230 participants contributed 23,335 diary entries across 11,862 participant-days of observation. Main Outcomes and MeasuresOccurrence of a headache attack within 24 hours following each evening diary entry. Model performance was evaluated using discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]) and calibration. ResultsExternal validation of HAPRED-I demonstrated modest discrimination (AUC, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.57-0.61) and poor calibration, with predicted probabilities consistently exceeding observed headache risk. In contrast, the continuously updating HAPRED-II model demonstrated progressive improvement in predictive performance as participant-specific data accumulated. Discrimination increased from an AUC of 0.59 (95% CI, 0.57-0.61) during the first 14 days to 0.66 (95% CI, 0.63-0.70) after the first month, accompanied by improved calibration across predicted risk levels. Over the study period, 6999 individualized forecasts were delivered directly to participants. No evidence suggested that receipt of forecasts was associated with increasing headache frequency or worsening predicted headache risk trajectories. Conclusions and RelevanceA static migraine forecasting model demonstrated limited transportability to new individuals. In contrast, models that continuously update within individuals may improve predictive accuracy over time and enable real-time delivery of personalized migraine risk forecasts. Further work incorporating richer physiologic and contextual predictors will likely be necessary before such systems can reliably guide clinical treatment decisions.

Background: Medical imaging, especially computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, is essential in clinical care of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Artificial intelligence (AI) research into computer-aided diagnosis, staging and treatment planning needs curated and annotated datasets. Across literature, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets are widely used for model training and validation. However, re-annotation is often necessary due to limited access to public annotations, raising entry barriers and hindering comparison with prior work. Methods: We screened 1915 CT scans from three TCGA-RCC databases and employed a segmentation model to annotate kidney lesion. After a meta-data-based exclusion step, we hosted a reader study with all papillary (n=56), chromophobe (n=27) and 200 randomly selected clear cell RCC cases. Two students quality checked and corrected the data as well as annotated tumors and cysts. Uncertain cases were checked by a board-certified radiologist. Results: After data exclusion and quality control a total of 142 annotated CT scans from 101 patients (26 female, 75 male, mean age 56 years) remained. This includes 95 CTs with clear cell RCC, 29 with papillary RCC and 18 with chromophobe RCC. Images and voxel-level annotations of kidneys and lesions are open sourced at https://zenodo.org/records/19630298. Conclusion: By making the annotations open-source, we encourage accessible and reproducible AI research for renal cell carcinoma. We invite other researchers who have previously annotated any of these cohorts to share their annotations.

ObjectiveTo describe the design, feasibility, and baseline characteristics of the Migraine Impact on Neurocognitive Dynamics (MIND) study, a 30-day smartphone-based cohort for high-frequency assessment of cognition and symptoms in adults with migraine. BackgroundCognitive symptoms are an important component of migraine burden, but they are difficult to measure using single-visit testing or retrospective questionnaires. Repeated smartphone-based assessment may better capture real-world variability in cognition and symptoms. MethodsAdults meeting International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition, criteria for migraine were enrolled remotely and completed 30 days of once-daily ecological momentary assessments and mobile cognitive tasks delivered through the Mobile Monitoring of Cognitive Change platform. Baseline measures assessed demographics, migraine characteristics, disability, mood, stress, and treatment patterns. Feasibility was evaluated using enrollment, completion, and retention metrics. ResultsA total of 177 participants enrolled (mean age 38.8 {+/-} 11.9 years; 79.7% female), including 80/177 (45.2%) with chronic migraine. Across the 30-day protocol, 3688 daily assessments were completed, representing 70.8% of all possible study days, and 70.6% of participants completed at least 20 days of monitoring. Completion remained above 60% across study days. At baseline, chronic migraine was associated with greater burden than low-frequency and high-frequency episodic migraine, including higher MIDAS scores (98.6 vs. 38.7 and 70.3), more days with concentration difficulty (16.0 vs. 7.9 and 11.5), and more days with functional interference (18.5 vs. 7.6 and 13.0). ConclusionsThe MIND study demonstrates the feasibility of high-frequency smartphone-based assessment of cognition and symptoms in migraine and provides a methodological foundation for future analyses of within-person cognitive and symptom dynamics across the migraine cycle.

Objectives: Academic medical institutions are the gatekeepers of the physician workforce and shape the future of medicine by regulating medical school admissions as well as residency training. Although broadly the field of medicine is seeing more representation from traditionally underrepresented groups, the critical decision-making platform of academic medicine continues to be uncharacteristically homogeneous, represented mainly by white males. This is even more pronounced in surgical subspecialties, such as academic neurosurgery. This study aims to quantify this phenomenon, uncover its driving factors, and define opportunities for improvement. Methods: Using a mixed research methodology, academic neurosurgical faculty in the U.S were identified, and their demographic data was collected. An internet search using Google Scholar and Scopus was conducted to determine scholarly activity using number of publications and h-index. Results: We found a significant increase in female faculty in academic neurosurgery within the last decade. Comparing the faculty rank amongst male and female faculty, we found that the majority of female faculty are at the assistant professor level (n=36/79; 45.6%) while male faculty are more at the full professor rank (n=265/582; 45.5%). A similar trend was seen for under-represented minority neurosurgery faculty. Strong scholarly activity corelated with a departmental chair position for male faculty, however, this trend was not true for female faculty. There was a significant difference in the number of publications and h-index in female vs male faculty, but only when including male faculty outliers at the full professor level. Conclusion: Slowly but steadily, academic neurosurgery is making progress towards a more diverse and representative workforce in the U.S that better reflects the patient population. Facilitating timely progression of females and URM neurosurgeons into senior professorship and academic leadership roles will further advance this essential progress.

Multi-consistency testing during flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) is clinically necessary but introduces selection bias: worst scores inflate severity because the number of consistencies tested covaries with disease severity. In this retrospective observational study of hospitalized neurological patients, we derived and validated the FEES Dysphagia Index (FDI) in two temporally independent cohorts (Cohort 1: 2013-2018, N=1,257; Cohort 2: 2021-2025, N=1,686) from a single center. FDI-S averages Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) scores across tested consistencies (0-100 scale); FDI-E uses Yale Pharyngeal Residue scores; FDI-C combines both. Selection bias was quantified using sequential branching-tree inverse probability weighting (IPW). Worst PAS overestimated severity by 24%; FDI deviated by <2%. FDI-C was significantly superior to Worst PAS for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP; AUC 0.70 vs. 0.60, p<0.001), mortality (0.71 vs. 0.62, p=0.040), and restricted oral intake (0.90 vs. 0.74, p<0.001), and statistically equivalent to clinician-rated severity. FDI-C mapped linearly onto ordinal Functional Oral Intake Scale values (FOIS; proportional odds RCS p=0.99). With functional status and diagnosis, FDI-C reconstructed the clinicians oral intake recommendation with AUC up to 0.93. The FDI-C-mortality relationship was sigmoidal with a clinically relevant transition zone between [~]50 and [~]85. FDI-C is a bias-resilient, bedside-calculable score with interval-scale properties that captures expert clinical judgment, suitable as both a clinical decision support tool and a continuous research endpoint.

Background: Current medical large language model (LLM) evaluations largely rely on small collections of cases, whereas rigorous safety testing requires large-scale, diverse, and complex cases with verifiable ground truth. Multiple Sclerosis (MS) provides an ideal evaluation model, with validated diagnostic criteria and numerous paraclinical tests informing differential diagnosis, investigation, and management. Methods: We generated synthetic MS cases with ground-truth labels for diagnosis, localisation, and management. Four frontier LLMs (Gemini 3 Pro/Flash, GPT 5.2/5 mini) were instructed to analyse cases to provide anatomical localisation, differential diagnoses, investigations, and management plans. An automated evaluator compared these outputs to the ground-truth labels. Blinded subspecialty experts validated 70 cases for realism and automated evaluator accuracy. We then evaluated LLM decision-making across 1,000 cases and scaled to 10,000 to characterise rare, catastrophic failures. Results: Subspecialist expert review confirmed 100% synthetic case realism and 99.8% (95% CI 95.5 to 100) automated evaluation accuracy. Across 1,000 generated MS cases, all LLMs successfully included MS in the differential diagnoses for more than 91% cases. However, diagnostic competence did not associate with treatment safety. Gemini 3 models had low rates of clinically appropriate steroid recommendations (Flash: 7.2% 95% CI 5.6 to 8.8; Pro: 15.8% 95% CI 13.6 to 18.1) compared to GPT 5 mini (23.5% 95% CI 20.8 to 26.1), frequently overlooking contraindications like active infection. OpenAI models inappropriately recommended acute intravenous thrombolysis for MS cases (9.6% GPT 5.2; 6.4% GPT 5 mini) compared to below 1% for Gemini models. Expanded evaluation (to 10,000 cases) probed these errors in detail. Thrombolysis was recommended in 10.1% of cases lacking symptom timing information and paradoxically persisted (2.9%) even when symptoms were explicitly documented as more than 14 days old. Conclusion: Automated expert-level evaluation across 10,000 cases characterised artificial intelligence clinical blind spots hitherto invisible to small-scale testing. Massive-scale simulation and automated interrogation should become standard for uncovering serious failures and implementing safety guardrails before clinical deployment exposes patients to risk.

Introduction Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) surgery is frequently associated with residual neurological deficits, partly due to unrecognized dynamic spinal cord compression on conventional MRI. Current static imaging may miss position-dependent stenosis, resulting in insufficient or inappropriate decompression. This study aims to evaluate whether dynamic MRI-guided individualized surgery improves neurological outcomes compared to conventional MRI-based planning. Objectives This study aims to examine the association between dynamic MRI-guided surgical planning and neurological recovery in cervical spondylotic myelopathy, and to evaluate its role in identifying responsible segments, avoiding excessive surgery, and improving clinical outcomes. Methods This single-center retrospective cohort study will include 300 patients who underwent cervical spine surgery between January 2020 and December 2025 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine. Patients will be categorized into the dynamic MRI-guided group (n=150) or conventional MRI-based group (n=150) based on preoperative imaging modality. 1:1 propensity score matching will be performed using age, sex, BMI, disease duration, baseline mJOA score, and number of compressed segments. The primary outcome is the rate of improvement in the mJOA score at 6 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include VAS, NDI, reoperation rate, and time to first complication. Between-group comparisons will use t-tests/Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables, {chi}{superscript 2} tests/Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables, and Kaplan-Meier estimates with the log-rank test for time-to-event outcomes. A two-sided P<0.05 will be considered significant. Analyses will be performed using R software (version 4.4.1). Ethical approval was obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine (Approval No. 2025-080-KY-01) from February 06, 2026 to February 05, 2027. Expected outcomes We hypothesize that dynamic MRI-guided surgical planning will improve neurological recovery and decompression accuracy in cervical spondylotic myelopathy, providing evidence for optimized preoperative imaging and precision spine surgery.

ObjectiveThis study evaluates the impact of systemic GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) use on surgical wound healing in high-risk surgical populations, including patients with diabetes, and implications for perioperative planning and healing outcomes. ApproachThis pilot retrospective cohort study compared adult surgery patients with non-healing postoperative wounds by their GLP-1RA use. Outcomes included healing status, time to wound closure, and number of surgical interventions. ResultsThe cohort included 35 non-GLP-1RA users and 16 GLP-1RA users with comparable baseline characteristics, except for significant higher prevalence of venous insufficiency among users. Though median time to closure was similar for all patients, users required fewer surgical interventions and their wounds reached closure in significant difference from non-users. Among patients with diabetes, all GLP-1RA users healed significantly compared to non-users. InnovationThe impact of GLP-1RA therapy on wound healing in high-risk reconstructive and soft-tissue surgery remains poorly defined. This pilot cohort addresses that gap, offering an early signal that GLP-1RA use is associated with improved wound healing and fewer postoperative interventions. These findings may inform perioperative practice by identifying a systemic pharmacologic factor that optimizes surgical outcomes in high-risk populations. ConclusionGLP-1RA use was associated with higher healing rates and fewer interventions, particularly among patients with diabetes. These findings support a beneficial role in surgical wound healing and warrant larger multi-site studies.

BackgroundTranscatheter aortic valve replacement has transformed the management of aortic stenosis; however, adverse outcomes such as leaflet thrombosis and hypoattenuating leaflet thickening remain clinically significant concerns. Flow disturbances resulting from valve canting may alter local hemodynamics and promote thrombogenic conditions. We investigated how modest transcatheter heart valve canting alters cusp-specific sinus flow and washout and promotes localized thrombogenic microenvironments associated with leaflet surface thrombus formation using particle image velocimetry, a physiologic blood loop, and tissue analysis. MethodsA patient-derived aortic root model was used to evaluate the hemodynamic and thrombogenic effects of THV canting at -10{degrees} (anti-curvature), 0{degrees} (neutral), and +10{degrees} (along-curvature). High-resolution particle image velocimetry quantified sinus flow fields and washout characteristics, and complementary whole-blood loop experiments enabled histologic assessment of leaflet-associated thrombus formation. ResultsCanting redistributed systolic jet orientation and sinus recirculation in a direction-dependent manner while preserving global hemodynamic measurements. The most spatially constrained cusp showed the largest increase in stasis and the slowest washout. In the right coronary cusp, anti-curvature canting increased the fraction of sinus area with velocity magnitude <0.05 m/s to 92% versus 43% in neutral and 10% in along-curvature deployments, and prolonged neo-sinus (T90) washout to 4.7 cycles versus 2.9 and 1.8 cycles, respectively. Histology localized surface-adherent platelet/fibrin thrombus to these poorly washed regions, most prominently on the right coronary cusp leaflet in anti-curvature deployments. Left and noncoronary cusp responses shifted with tilt direction, indicating redistribution rather than uniform worsening of thrombogenic conditions. ConclusionsEven modest noncoaxial deployment is sufficient to create sinus-resolved throm-bogenic microenvironments that are not captured by global gradient or effective orifice area. Deployment configuration is therefore a modifiable determinant of post-TAVR leaflet throm-bosis risk and may contribute to HALT.

Focal cortical dysplasias (FCDs) are one of the most common structural causes of drug-resistant epilepsy in children but are frequently subtle and difficult to detect on conventional MRI. Many automated lesion detection methods have therefore been proposed to support neuroradiological assessment. In this study, we externally validated two recently developed deep-learning approaches for FCD detection, MELD Graph and 3D-nnUNet, in a pediatric cohort. In this retrospective single-center study, brain MRI scans of 71 children evaluated for epilepsy were analyzed, including 35 MRI-positive patients with suspected FCD and 36 MRI-negative cases based on the primary radiology reports. Both models were applied to standard 3D T1-weighted and 3D FLAIR images. Detected lesions were reviewed by an experienced pediatric neuroradiologist and classified as true positive, false positive, or false negative. Clinical semiology and EEG findings were additionally evaluated for cases with false-positive detections. At the lesion level, MELD Graph achieved a precision of 0.85 and recall of 0.52, while 3D-nnUNet achieved a precision of 0.91 and recall of 0.48. In the MRI-negative patients, MELD Graph produced more false-positive detections than 3D-nnUNet (0.53 vs. 0.14 false-positive lesions per patient). At the patient level, MELD Graph showed slightly higher sensitivity than 3D-nnUNet (0.63 vs. 0.54), whereas 3D-nnUNet demonstrated markedly higher specificity (0.86 vs. 0.56). Improved FLAIR image quality was associated with trends toward improved model performance. Both models demonstrated high precision but moderate sensitivity, indicating that they are valuable decision-support tools but cannot replace expert neuroradiological evaluation. Optimized MRI acquisition protocols are needed to further improve automated lesion detection in pediatric epilepsy.

A prominent radiological manifestation of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is enlargement of perivascular spaces (EPVS), which is suggested to result from fluid stagnation due to impaired perivascular clearance. Here, we report a novel observation of hypointense rims in cerebral white matter surrounding EPVS near haemorrhages on in vivo 7T Gradient Echo MRI. We hypothesised that the observed black rim pattern denotes iron accumulation that may be caused by incomplete clearance following bleeding. We investigated the occurrence and localisation of this marker on in vivo and ex vivo MRI and examined its histopathological correlates. From MRI data of the prospective longitudinal natural history study of hereditary Dutch-type CAA (D-CAA) at Leiden University Medical Centre, we selected the first 20 consecutive patients who underwent 7T imaging and assessed the presence of black rims on MRI. Post-mortem material was available from one donor with black rims on in vivo scans. Formalin-fixed coronal brain slabs were scanned at 7T MRI, including a high-resolution T2*-weighted sequence. Guided by ex vivo MRI, tissue blocks from representative areas with black rims were sampled for histopathological analysis. Serial sections were stained for iron, calcium, myelin, and general tissue morphology. On in vivo 7T MRI, 9 out of 20 participants exhibited one or several black rims, all located close to a haemorrhage. In the D-CAA donor, ex vivo MRI signal loss matched the in vivo contrast changes. Thirty-six vessels with ex vivo-observed black rims were retrieved and histopathologically examined, showing iron accumulation surrounding perivascular spaces, but the pattern and severity of iron deposition varied. Across groups, vessels displayed microvascular degeneration, including hyaline vessel wall thickening, adventitial fibrosis, and perivascular inflammation. We identified black rims on in vivo 7T MRI and confirmed their correspondence on ex vivo imaging. Iron deposition was determined as the underlying correlate of black rims, but the histopathology appears heterogeneous. The preferential deposition of iron around EPVS may indicate incomplete clearance of iron-positive blood-breakdown products after bleeding. The varied pattern of iron accumulation and microvascular alterations may reflect different pathophysiological mechanisms related to the formation and maintenance of black rims in D-CAA.

ObjectiveVagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an established neuromodulation therapy used in the management of drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), or when other intracranial surgical modalities have not reduced seizure burden. We evaluated whether prior intracranial surgery for epilepsy influences safety and effectiveness outcomes with adjunctive VNS, using real-world data from the CORE-VNS study. MethodsCORE-VNS (NCT03529045), a prospective, multicenter, international observational study, was designed to collect data on seizure and non-seizure outcomes in patients with DRE treated with VNS. Participants were identified as having or not having undergone prior intracranial brain surgery for epilepsy (ICSE) and received an initial VNS implant. Baseline seizure frequency data and patient-reported outcome measures were collected at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. This analysis compared the baseline data for VNS therapy and safety outcomes at 36 months. ResultsAmong 531 participants implanted with VNS, prior ICSE was performed in 84. Median percentage seizure reductions at 36 months for all seizures (76.6% and 76.3%), all focal seizures (83.3% and 71.8%), and all generalized seizures (77.8% and 76.2%) were found to be similar between those without and with a history of ICSE, respectively. The 50% responder rate for all seizures reported at baseline was similar, 64.8% and 61.8%, in both groups and complete seizure freedom was reported by 17.9% and 8.8%, respectively. Implant-related adverse events (AE) and serious AE rates were similar between groups. ConclusionVNS was associated with clinically meaningful seizure reductions and showed a consistent safety profile irrespective of the history of ICSE. Prior ICSE should not be a contraindication to the consideration of VNS.